Undermining truthmaker theory

Synthese 192 (1):185-200 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Truthmaker theorists hold that there is a metaphysically explanatory relation that holds between true claims and what exists. While some critics try to provide counterexamples to truthmaker theory, that response quickly leads to a dialectical standoff. The aim of this paper is to move beyond that standoff by attempting to undermine some standard arguments for truthmaker theory. Using realism about truth and a more pragmatic account of explanation, I show how some of those arguments can be undermined
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PERUTT
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 2 (2015-11-21)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Truth and Truthmakers.Armstrong, D. M.
Truth.Horwich, Paul
Truth and Ontology.Merricks, Trenton

View all 36 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-09-27

Total downloads
326 ( #7,655 of 37,180 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
57 ( #6,084 of 37,180 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.