Aggregating agents with opinions about different propositions

Synthese (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
There are many reasons we might want to take the opinions of various individuals and pool them to give the opinions of the group they constitute. If all the individuals in the group have probabilistic opinions about the same propositions, there is a host of pooling functions we might deploy, such as linear or geometric pooling. However, there are also cases where different members of the group assign probabilities to different sets of propositions, which might overlap a lot, a little, or not at all. There are far fewer proposals for how to proceed in these cases, and those there are have undesirable features. I begin by considering four proposals and arguing that they don't work. Then I'll describe my own proposal, which is intended to cover the situation in which we want to pool the individual opinions in order to ascribe an opinion to the group considered as an agent in its own right.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2021-10-27
Latest version: 3 (2022-08-01)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
258 ( #29,797 of 71,191 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
166 ( #3,355 of 71,191 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.