Democracy Before, In, and After Schumpeter

Critical Review 29 (4):492-504 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The classical model of democracy that Schumpeter criticizes is manufactured out of a variety of earlier ideas, not those of any one thinker or even one school of thought. His critique of the central ideals by which he defines the model--those of the common will and the common good--remains persuasive. People's preferences are too messy and too manipulable to allow us to think that mass democracy can promote those ideals, as he defines them. Should we endorse his purely electoral model of democracy then, and accept that people do not exercise any control over government? Not necessarily. We can expand democracy to include the constitutional and contestatory constraints that people impose on their rulers. We may hope that people can rely on such democratic controls to ensure that government operates by community standards.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
2017
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PETDBI
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-05-23
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-10-25

Total views
182 ( #23,731 of 51,672 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #35,701 of 51,672 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.