On the Automaticity and Ethics of Belief

Teoria:99–115. (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Recently, philosophers have appealed to empirical studies to argue that whenever we think that p, we automatically believe that p (Millikan 2004; Mandelbaum 2014; Levy and Mandelbaum 2014). Levy and Mandelbaum (2014) have gone further and claimed that the automaticity of believing has implications for the ethics of belief in that it creates epistemic obligations for those who know about their automatic belief acquisition. I use theoretical considerations and psychological findings to raise doubts about the empirical case for the view that we automatically believe what we think. Furthermore, I contend that even if we set these doubts aside, Levy and Mandelbaum’s argument to the effect that the automaticity of believing creates epistemic obligations is not fully convincing.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PETOTA-4
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-03-18
Latest version: 3 (2018-08-27)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Thinking is Believing.Mandelbaum, Eric
Self-Knowing Agents.O’Brien, Lucy

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-03-18

Total views
132 ( #26,944 of 47,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #21,723 of 47,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.