The ethics of robot servitude

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Assume we could someday create artificial creatures with intelligence comparable to our own. Could it be ethical use them as unpaid labor? There is very little philosophical literature on this topic, but the consensus so far has been that such robot servitude would merely be a new form of slavery. Against this consensus I defend the permissibility of robot servitude, and in particular the controversial case of designing robots so that they want to serve human ends. A typical objection to this case draws an analogy to the genetic engineering of humans: if designing eager robot servants is permissible, it should also be permissible to design eager human servants. Few ethical views can easily explain even the wrongness of such human engineering, however, and those few explanations that are available break the analogy with engineering robots. The case turns out to be illustrative of profound problems in the field of population ethics
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PETTEO
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-03-10
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
332 ( #16,409 of 57,013 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
61 ( #11,523 of 57,013 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.