Unveiling the Vote

British Journal of Political Science 20 (3):311-333 (1990)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The case for secrecy in voting depends on the assumption that voters reliably vote for the political outcomes they want to prevail. No such assumption is valid. Accordingly, voting procedures should be designed to provide maximal incentive for voters to vote responsibly. Secret voting fails this test because citizens are protected from public scrutiny. Under open voting, citizens are publicly answerable for their electoral choices and will be encouraged thereby to vote in a discursively defensible manner. The possibility of bribery, intimidation or blackmail moderates this argument but such dangers will be avoidable in many contemporary societies without recourse to secrecy.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-06-14
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
72 ( #38,405 of 51,473 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #43,272 of 51,473 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.