Entitativity and Implicit Measures of Social Cognition

Mind and Language (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I argue that in addressing worries about the validity and reliability of implicit measures of social cognition, theorists should draw on research concerning “entitativity perception.” In brief, an aggregate of people is perceived as highly “entitative” when its members exhibit a certain sort of unity. For example, think of the difference between the aggregate of people waiting in line at a bank versus a tight-knit group of friends: the latter seems more “groupy” than the former. I start by arguing that entitativity perception modulates the activation of implicit biases and stereotypes. I then argue that recognizing this modulatory role will help researchers to address concerns surrounding the validity and reliability of implicit measures.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-08-02
Latest version: 2 (2021-04-04)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
174 ( #33,344 of 2,449,197 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
50 ( #13,197 of 2,449,197 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.