Sungnōmē in Aristotle

Apeiron 50 (3):311-333 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Aristotle claims that in some extenuating circumstances, the correct response to the wrongdoer is sungnōmē rather than blame. Sungnōmē has a wide spectrum of meanings that include aspects of sympathy, pity, fellow-feeling, pardon, and excuse, but the dominant interpretation among scholars takes Aristotle’s meaning to correspond most closely to forgiveness. Thus, it is commonly held that the virtuous Aristotelian agent ought to forgive wrongdoers in specific extenuating circumstances. Against the more popular forgiveness interpretation, I begin by defending a positive account of sungnōmē as the correct judgment that a wrongdoer deserves excuse since she was not blameworthy. I then argue that since sungnōmē is merited on the grounds of fairness, this shows that both the forgiveness interpretation and a third, alternative interpretation of sungnōmē as sympathy mischaracterize both the justification for sungnōmē and its nature. Moreover, I argue that Aristotle not only lacks an account of forgiveness but in fact, that his account of blame is incompatible with forgiveness altogether.
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PHISIA-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-10-11
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
[Book Review] Forgiveness and Mercy. [REVIEW]Murphy, Jeffrie G. & Hampton, Jean
Forgiveness.Hughes, Martin

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-10-11

Total views
268 ( #12,064 of 41,490 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
55 ( #10,732 of 41,490 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.