Can Hinge Epistemology Close the Door on Epistemic Relativism?

Synthese (1-2):1-27 (2021)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I argue that a standard formulation of hinge epistemology is host to epistemic relativism and show that two leading hinge approaches (Coliva’s acceptance account and Pritchard’s nondoxastic account) are vulnerable to a form of incommensurability that leads to relativism. Building on both accounts, I introduce a new, minimally epistemic conception of hinges that avoids epistemic relativism and rationally resolves hinge disagreements. According to my proposed account, putative cases of epistemic incommensurability are rationally resolvable: hinges are propositions that are the objects of our belief-like attitudes and are rationally revisable in virtue of our overarching commitment to avoid systematic deception in our epistemic practices.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-12-07
Latest version: 3 (2021-01-03)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
306 ( #21,885 of 64,128 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
104 ( #5,698 of 64,128 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.