Phenomenological Argumentative Structure

Argumentation 15 (2):173-189 (2001)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The nontechnical ability to identify or match argumentative structure seems to be an important reasoning skill. Instruments that have questions designed to measure this skill include major standardized tests for graduate school admission, for example, the United States-Canadian Law School Admission Test (LSAT), the Graduate Record Examinations (GRE), and the Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT). Writers and reviewers of such tests need an appropriate foundation for developing such questions--they need a proper representation of phenomenological argumentative structure--for legitimacy, and because these tests affect people's lives. This paper attempts to construct an adequate and appropriate representation of such structure, that is, the logical structure that an argument is perceived to have by mature reasoners, albeit ones who are untrained in logic.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Word and Object.Quine, Willard Van Orman
Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts.Ingber, Warren; Bach, Kent & Harnish, Robert M.
The Justification of Deduction.Dummett, Michael A. E.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Can Cogency Vanish?Plumer, Gilbert

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
552 ( #4,809 of 41,562 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
69 ( #7,839 of 41,562 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.