Reasoning from Conflicting Sources

In Hans V. Hansen, Christopher W. Tindale, J. Anthony Blair, Ralph H. Johnson & David M. Godden (eds.), Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground. Proceedings 2007 [CD-ROM]. Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. pp. 1-9 (2007)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
One might ask of two or more texts—what can be inferred from them, taken together? If the texts happen to contradict each other in some respect, then the unadorned answer of standard logic is EVERYTHING. But it seems to be a given that we often successfully reason with inconsistent information from multiple sources. The purpose of this paper is to attempt to develop an adequate approach to accounting for this given.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Paraconsistent Logic.Priest, Graham
Philosophy of Logic.Stevenson, Leslie & Quine, W. V.
Uncertain Inference.Kyburg Jr, & Teng, Choh Man

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
191 ( #16,530 of 41,512 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #23,275 of 41,512 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.