Reasoning from Conflicting Sources

In Hans V. Hansen, Christopher W. Tindale, J. Anthony Blair, Ralph H. Johnson & David M. Godden (eds.), Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground. Proceedings 2007 [CD-ROM]. Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. pp. 1-9 (2007)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
One might ask of two or more texts—what can be inferred from them, taken together? If the texts happen to contradict each other in some respect, then the unadorned answer of standard logic is EVERYTHING. But it seems to be a given that we often successfully reason with inconsistent information from multiple sources. The purpose of this paper is to attempt to develop an adequate approach to accounting for this given.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PLURFC
Upload history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 2 (2021-02-22)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2012-10-30

Total views
257 ( #20,987 of 56,917 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #29,226 of 56,917 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.