Framing the Ethical Boundaries of Humor

The Philosophy of Humor Yearbook 3 (1):153-178 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Humor is unlike other forms of communication because its content is not meant literally. Like acts of play, humor is not intended to be taken at face value. As a consequence, the assumptions and rules that govern normal conversation do not apply. Humor therefore depends upon both the speaker and the audience fully understanding that what was communicated should be treated in this unique way. The play frame refers to this shared understanding about the nature of the communication. Analyzing whether a communication falls within the play frame may help us better understand not only whether the communication can be deemed non-serious or serious, but also whether it can be treated uniquely as merely the speaker’s attempt at play or as a typical instance of literal speech for which the speaker can be deemed ethically responsible.

Author's Profile

David Poplar
University of Arizona

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-05

Downloads
615 (#24,398)

6 months
463 (#3,281)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?