Not all slurs are equal

Phenomenology and Mind 11:150-156 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Slurs are typically defined as conveying contempt based on group-membership. However, here I argue that they are not a unitary group. First, I describe two dimensions of variation among derogatives: how targets are identified, and how offensive the term is. This supports the typical definition of slurs as opposed to other derogatives. I then highlight problems with this definition, mainly caused by variable offence across slur words. In the process I discuss how major theories of slurs can account for variable offence, and conclude that contempt based on group-membership doesn’t cover all the data. I finish by noting that the most offensive slurs are those that target oppressed groups. I claim it is oppression that underpins most offence, and that beyond this offensive property, some slurs are actively used to oppress.
Reprint years
2016
PhilPapers/Archive ID
POPNAS
Revision history
First archival date: 2016-10-23
Latest version: 2 (2017-01-05)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Slurs, Roles and Power.Mihaela Popa-Wyatt & Jeremy L. Wyatt - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 175 (11):2879-2906.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-10-23

Total views
723 ( #2,422 of 37,264 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
343 ( #784 of 37,264 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.