Learning Concepts: A Learning-Theoretic Solution to the Complex-First Paradox

Philosophy of Science (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Children acquire complex concepts like DOG earlier than simple concepts like BROWN, even though our best neuroscientific theories suggest that learning the former is harder than learning the latter and, thus, should take more time (Werning2010). This is the Complex- First Paradox. We present a novel solution to the Complex-First Paradox. Our solution builds on a generalization of Xu and Tenenbaum’s (XTB07a) Bayesian model of word learning. By focusing on a rational theory of concept learning, we show that it is easier to infer the meaning of complex concepts than that of simple concepts.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
POTLCA
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-10-13
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-09-05

Total views
21 ( #44,549 of 45,683 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #32,661 of 45,683 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.