Model-based Cognitive Neuroscience: Multifield Mechanistic Integration in Practice

Theory & Psychology (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Autonomist accounts of cognitive science suggest that cognitive model building and theory construction (can or should) proceed independently of findings in neuroscience. Common functionalist justifications of autonomy rely on there being relatively few constraints between neural structure and cognitive function (e.g., Weiskopf, 2011). In contrast, an integrative mechanistic perspective stresses the mutual constraining of structure and function (e.g., Piccinini & Craver, 2011; Povich, 2015). In this paper, I show how model-based cognitive neuroscience (MBCN) epitomizes the integrative mechanistic perspective and concentrates the most revolutionary elements of the cognitive neuroscience revolution (Boone & Piccinini, 2016). I also show how the prominent subset account of functional realization supports the integrative mechanistic perspective I take on MBCN and use it to clarify the intralevel and interlevel components of integration.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-02-22
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Computation and Cognition.Pylyshyn, Zenon W.
Explaining the Brain.Craver, Carl F.
Physical Realization.Shoemaker, Sydney
Thinking About Mechanisms.Machamer, Peter K.; Darden, Lindley & Craver, Carl F.

View all 44 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
124 ( #27,842 of 47,123 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
67 ( #10,535 of 47,123 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.