Financial Power and Democratic Legitimacy

Social Theory and Practice 48 (1):115-140 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

To what extent are questions of sovereign debt a matter for political rather than scientific or moral adjudication? We answer that question by defending three claims. We argue that (i) moral and technocratic takes on sovereign debt tend to be ideological in a pejorative sense of the term, and that therefore (ii) sovereign debt should be politicised all the way down. We then show that this sort of politicisation need not boil down to the crude Realpolitik of debtor-creditor power relations—a conclusion that would leave no room for normative theory, among other problems. Rather, we argue that (iii) in a democratic context, a realist approach to politics centred on what Bernard Williams calls ‘The Basic Legitimation Demand’ affords a deliberative approach to the normative evaluation of public debt policy options.

Author Profiles

Janosch Prinz
University of East Anglia
Enzo Rossi
University of Amsterdam

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-29

Downloads
679 (#25,694)

6 months
146 (#29,376)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?