Social Support Is Not the Only Problematic Criterion, But If Used at All, “Lack of Social Support” Should Count in Favor of Listing, Not Against

American Journal of Bioethics 19 (11):35-37 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Berry, Daniels, and Ladin make a strong argument for discontinuing the use of, “lack of social support,” as an organ transplantation listing criterion. This argument, however, actually leads to conclusions much stronger than those that the authors’ propose: The argument works equally well against using, (1) any “psychosocial” factors at all as a listing criterion, and, (2) any criteria other than factors that directly relate to empirically established medical need, and/or empirically established survival rate. Moreover, while the authors rightly point to a lack of empirical evidence connecting social support to survivability, they neglect mentioning that the empirical literature on social support provides grounds to favor listing persons who seem to, sadly, lack a social support system.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-10-02
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Should Lack of Social Support Prevent Access to Organ Transplantation?Ladin, Keren; Daniels, Norman & Berry, Kelsey N.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
21 ( #42,213 of 43,857 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #28,911 of 43,857 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.