Timaeus 48e-52d and the Third Man Argument

Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 9:123-147 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this article I argue that "Timaeus" 48e-52d, the passage in which Plato introduces the receptacle into his ontology, Contains the material for a satisfactory response to the third man argument. Plato's use of "this" and "such" to distinguish the receptacle, Becoming, And the forms clarifies the nature of his ontology and indicates that the forms are not, In general, self-predicative. This result removes one argument against regarding the "Timaeus" as a late dialogue.

Author's Profile

William Prior
Santa Clara University


Added to PP

399 (#25,540)

6 months
69 (#22,146)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?