Neuro-interventions as Criminal Rehabilitation: An Ethical Review

In Jonathan D. Jacobs & Jonathan Jackson (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Criminal Justice Ethics. London: Routledge (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
According to a number of influential views in penal theory, 1 one of the primary goals of the criminal justice system is to rehabilitate offenders. Rehabilitativemeasures are commonly included as a part of a criminal sentence. For example, in some jurisdictions judges may order violent offenders to attend anger management classes or to undergo cognitive behavioural therapy as a part of their sentences. In a limited number of cases, neurointerventions — interventions that exert a direct biological effect on the brain — have been used as aids to rehabilitation, typically being imposed as part of criminal sentences, separate treatment orders, or conditions of parole. Examples of such interventions include medications intended to attenuate addictive desires in substance-abusing offenders and agents intended to suppress libido in sex offenders.This chapter reviews some of the ethical issues raised by the use of neurointerventions as aids to rehabilitation.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-08-03
Latest version: 2 (2018-03-07)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Self-Control in Responsibility Enhancement and Criminal Rehabilitation.Koi, Polaris; Uusitalo, Susanne & Tuominen, Jarno

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
308 ( #13,489 of 47,166 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
101 ( #5,840 of 47,166 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.