Does Division Multiply Desert?

Philosophical Review 123 (1):43-77 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
It seems plausible that (i) how much punishment a person deserves cannot be affected by the mere existence or nonexistence of another person. We might have also thought that (ii) how much punishment is deserved cannot increase merely in virtue of personal division. I argue that (i) and (ii) are inconsistent with the popular belief that, other things being equal, when people culpably do very wrong or bad acts, they ought to be punished for this—even if they have repented, are now virtuous, and punishing them would benefit no one. Insofar as we cannot deny (i), we are either forced to abandon the popular belief in desert, or else allow that personal division could, as I put it, “multiply desert.” Some may not find the latter, considered by itself, troubling. But I argue that the thesis that division multiplies desert faces a potentially serious problem, which arises in the context of personal fusion. It is difficult to see how to maintain a particular family of desert views in light of the cases here presented
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PUMDDM
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-12-02
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Divided We Fall.Ross, Jacob

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-12-21

Total downloads
66 ( #24,550 of 35,838 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #22,711 of 35,838 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.