Spectrum arguments and hypersensitivity

Philosophical Studies 175 (7):1729-1744 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Larry Temkin famously argues that what he calls spectrum arguments yield strong reason to reject Transitivity, according to which the ‘all-things-considered better than’ relation is transitive. Spectrum arguments do reveal that the conjunctions of independently plausible claims are inconsistent with Transitivity. But I argue that there is very strong independent reason to reject such conjunctions of claims, and thus that the fact that they are inconsistent with Transitivity does not yield strong reason to reject Transitivity.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
2017, 2018
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PUMSAA-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-12-02
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Bayesianism, Infinite Decisions, and Binding.Arntzenius, Frank; Elga, Adam & Hawthorne, John

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-06-03

Total downloads
25 ( #31,564 of 35,870 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #14,891 of 35,870 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.