Frege on Vagueness and Ordinary Language

Philosophical Quarterly 63 (250):120-140 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Frege, we are told, believes that vague predicates have no referent (Bedeutung). But given other things he evidently believes, such a position would seem to commit him to a suspect nihilism according to which assertoric sentences containing vague predicates are neither true nor false. I argue that we have good reason to resist ascribing to Frege the view that vague predicates have no Bedeutung and thus good reason to resist seeing him as committed to the suspect nihilism. In the process, I call attention to several under-appreciated texts in which Frege suggests that a vague predicate, though lacking a Bedeutung of its own, can come to acquire a Bedeutung in certain contexts. The upshot of this suggestion is that vague predicates can serve the purposes of ordinary communication quite well, even if they are useless for logical purposes.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-04-19
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Vagueness.Williamson, Timothy

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Vagueness as Indecision.MacFarlane, John

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
220 ( #20,006 of 50,414 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #23,373 of 50,414 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.