Does Philosophy Have a Vindicatory History? Bernard Williams on the History of Philosophy

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper develops Bernard Williams’s suggestion that for philosophy to ignore its history is for it to assume that its history is vindicatory. The paper aims to offer a fruitful line of inquiry into the question whether philosophy has a vindicatory history by providing a map of possible answers to it. It first distinguishes three types of history: the history of discovery, the history of progress, and the history of change. It then suggests that much of philosophy lacks a vindicatory history, for reasons that reflect philosophy’s character as a humanistic discipline. On this basis, the paper reconstructs Williams’s conception of what it means for philosophy to engage with its own history. The paper concludes that it is a mistake to think that a vindicatory history is what we would really like to have, and that in fact, the resulting picture gives philosophy several reasons to engage with its own history.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-07-03
Latest version: 3 (2018-04-18)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Genealogy and Knowledge-First Epistemology: A Mismatch?Matthieu Queloz - 2019 - Philosophical Quarterly 69 (274):100-120.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
175 ( #16,194 of 39,633 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
112 ( #3,487 of 39,633 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.