The Points of Concepts: Their Types, Tensions, and Connections

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 49 (8):1122-1145 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In the literature seeking to explain concepts in terms of their point, talk of ‘the point’ of concepts remains under-theorised. I propose a typology of points which distinguishes practical, evaluative, animating, and inferential points. This allows us to resolve tensions such as that between the ambition of explanations in terms of the points of concepts to be informative and the claim that mastering concepts requires grasping their point; and it allows us to exploit connections between types of points to understand why they come apart, and whether they do so for problematic ideological reasons or for benignly functional reasons.
Reprint years
2019
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
QUETPO-4
Upload history
First archival date: 2018-12-11
Latest version: 5 (2019-10-01)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-12-11

Total views
745 ( #4,760 of 51,658 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
209 ( #1,805 of 51,658 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.