The Points of Concepts: Their Types, Tensions, and Connections

Canadian Journal of Philosophy:1-24 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In the literature seeking to explain concepts in terms of their point, talk of ‘the point’ of concepts remains under-theorised. I propose a typology of points which distinguishes practical, evaluative, animating, and inferential points. This allows us to resolve tensions such as that between the ambition of explanations in terms of the points of concepts to be informative and the claim that mastering concepts requires grasping their point; and it allows us to exploit connections between types of points to understand why they come apart, and whether they do so for problematic ideological reasons or for benignly functional reasons.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
QUETPO-4
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-12-11
Latest version: 3 (2019-04-02)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
What is the Point of Equality?Anderson, Elizabeth S.
Law's Empire.DWORKIN, R.

View all 103 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-12-11

Total views
357 ( #8,698 of 41,573 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
234 ( #1,533 of 41,573 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.