Theories of Reference: What Was the Question?

In Andrea Bianchi (ed.), Language and Reality From a Naturalistic Perspective: Themes From Michael Devitt. Springer (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The new theory of reference has won popularity. However, a number of noted philosophers have also attempted to reply to the critical arguments of Kripke and others, and aimed to vindicate the description theory of reference. Such responses are often based on ingenious novel kinds of descriptions, such as rigidified descriptions, causal descriptions, and metalinguistic descriptions. This prolonged debate raises the doubt whether different parties really have any shared understanding of what the central question of the philosophical theory of reference is: what is the main question to which descriptivism and the causal-historical theory have presented competing answers. One aim of the paper is to clarify this issue. The most influential objections to the new theory of reference are critically reviewed. Special attention is also paid to certain important later advances in the new theory of reference, due to Devitt and others.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RAATOR-2
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-01-11
Latest version: 3 (2018-09-29)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Demonstratives.Kaplan, David

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-01-11

Total downloads
307 ( #7,665 of 35,800 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
163 ( #1,645 of 35,800 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.