Token-Reflexivity and Repetition

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The classical rule of Repetition says that if you take any sentence as a premise, and repeat it as a conclusion, you have a valid argument. It's a very basic rule of logic, and many other rules depend on the guarantee that repeating a sentence, or really, any expression, guarantees sameness of referent, or semantic value. However, Repetition fails for token-reflexive expressions. In this paper, I offer three ways that one might replace Repetition, and still keep an interesting notion of validity. Each is a fine way to go for certain purposes, but I argue that one in particular is to be preferred by the semanticist who thinks that there are token-reflexive expressions in natural languages.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RADTAR
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-06-13
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-06-13

Total views
226 ( #21,300 of 53,602 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
49 ( #12,947 of 53,602 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.