On Silhouettes, Surfaces and Sorensen
In Clare Mac Cumhaill & Thomas Crowther (eds.), Perceptual Ephemera. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 194-218 (2018)
Abstract
In his book “Seeing Dark Things” (2008), Roy Sorensen provides many wonderfully ingenious arguments for many surprising, counter-intuitive claims. One such claim in particular is that when we a silhouetted object – i.e. an opaque object lit entirely from behind – we literally see its back-side – i.e. we see the full expanse of the surface facing away from us that is blocking the incoming light. Sorensen himself admits that this seems a tough pill to swallow, later characterising it as “the most controversial thesis of the book” (2011, p199).
I will argue against Sorensen’s controversial thesis and in favour of what seems to me to be a much more natural and commonsensical alternative: when we see a silhouetted object, what we see is its edge and only its edge – so we do not see its entire back-side.
Keywords
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RALOSS
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-06-08
View upload history
View upload history

No references found.

No citations found.
Added to PP index
2018-06-08
Total views
20 ( #34,060 of 37,244 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #27,663 of 37,244 )
2018-06-08
Total views
20 ( #34,060 of 37,244 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #27,663 of 37,244 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.