Naturalism and ontology: A reply to Dale Jacquette

Faith and Philosophy 22 (3):343-357 (2005)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In World Without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Naturalism, I argued that there is an important sense in which naturalism’s current status as methodological orthodoxy is without rational foundation, and I argued that naturalists must give up two views that many of them are inclined to hold dear—realism about material objects and materialism. In a review recently published in Faith and Philosophy, Dale Jacquette alleges that my arguments in World Without Design are directed mainly against strawmen and that I have neglected to discuss at least one formulation of naturalism that straightforwardly addresses my main objections. In this reply, I show that these and other objections raised by Jacquette are unsound and, in fact, rest on egregious misrepresentations of the book.
ISBN(s)
0739-7046
PhilPapers/Archive ID
REANAO
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-02-07
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
195 ( #24,075 of 53,671 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #29,133 of 53,671 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.