Naturalism and ontology: A reply to Dale Jacquette

Faith and Philosophy 22 (3):343-357 (2005)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In World Without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Naturalism, I argued that there is an important sense in which naturalism’s current status as methodological orthodoxy is without rational foundation, and I argued that naturalists must give up two views that many of them are inclined to hold dear—realism about material objects and materialism. In a review recently published in Faith and Philosophy, Dale Jacquette alleges that my arguments in World Without Design are directed mainly against strawmen and that I have neglected to discuss at least one formulation of naturalism that straightforwardly addresses my main objections. In this reply, I show that these and other objections raised by Jacquette are unsound and, in fact, rest on egregious misrepresentations of the book.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
REANAO
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-02-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
156 ( #22,986 of 45,658 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #32,615 of 45,658 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.