Adding academic rigor to introductory ethics courses using Bloom’s taxonomy

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Since philosophy is a notoriously difficult subject, one may think that the concept of adding rigor to a philosophy course is misguided. Isn’t reading difficult texts by Immanuel Kant or Friedrich Nietzsche enough to categorize a class as academically rigorous? This question is based on the misguided assumption that academic rigor has only to do with course content. While course content is a component of academic rigor, other aspects such as higher-order thinking, as well as how an instructor designs and grades assignments, contribute to the level of academic rigor in a course. The author provides several ways to increase the level of academic rigor in a philosophy course based upon Bloom’s Taxonomy using examples from an introductory ethics course and then provides recommendations as to how to grade to promote academic rigor.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
2017, 2018
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RENAAR-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-11-13
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-11-13

Total views
417 ( #16,448 of 65,557 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
71 ( #10,605 of 65,557 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.