Skeptical hypotheses and 'omniscient' interpreters

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (2):184 – 195 (1993)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
An attempt to defend Davidson's omniscient interpreter argument against various attempts to show that it does not succeed in showing that most of our beliefs must be true. It doesn't argue that this is a good answer to skepticism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
REYSHA
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
193 ( #24,286 of 53,703 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #43,992 of 53,703 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.