Skeptical hypotheses and 'omniscient' interpreters

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (2):184 – 195 (1993)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
An attempt to defend Davidson's omniscient interpreter argument against various attempts to show that it does not succeed in showing that most of our beliefs must be true. It doesn't argue that this is a good answer to skepticism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
REYSHA
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
128 ( #19,547 of 39,000 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #22,138 of 39,000 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.