''You 're Being Unreasonable': Prior and Passing Theories of Critical Discussion

Argumentation 20 (2):149-166 (2006)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
A key and continuing concern within the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation is how to account for effective persuasion disciplined by dialectical rationality. Currently, van Eemeren and Houtlosser offer one response to this concern in the form of strategic manoeuvring. This paper offers a prior/passing theory of communicative interaction as a supplement to the strategic manoeuvring approach. Our use of a prior/passing model investigates how a difference of opinion can be resolved while both dialectic obligations of reasonableness and rhetorical ambitions of argumentative success are simultaneously accommodated. The paper explores the model with particular reference to the pragma-dialectical rules of critical discussion, strategic manoeuvring and fallacious reasoning
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-08-10
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Study of Argumentation as Normative Pragmatics.Houtlosser, Peter; Eemeren, Frans & van Eemeren, Frans H.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
39 ( #36,927 of 42,948 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #35,063 of 42,948 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.