capabilitarianism

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper offers a critique of Martha Nussbaum’s description of the capability approach, and offers an alternative. I will argue that Nussbaum’s characterization of the capability approach is flawed, in two ways. First, she unduly limits the capability to two strands of work, thereby ignoring important other capabilitarian scholarship. Second, she argues that there are five essential elements that all capability theories meet; yet upon closer analysis three of them are not really essential to the capability approach. I also offer an alternative description of the capability approach, which is called the cartwheel view of the capability approach. This view is at the same time radically multidisciplinary yet also contains a foundationally robust core among its various usages, and is therefore much better able to make the case that the capability approach can be developed in a very wide range of more specific normative theories. Finally, the cartwheel view is used to argue against Nussbaum's claim that all capabilitarian political theory needs to be politically liberal.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ROBC-21
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-08-10
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
What is the Point of Equality?Anderson, Elizabeth S.
Perfectionism and Politics.Arneson, Richard J.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
A Capabilities Approach to Prenatal Screening for Fetal Abnormalities.Stapleton, Greg; Dondorp, Wybo; Schröder-Bäck, Peter & de Wert, Guido

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-08-10

Total views
192 ( #21,800 of 49,026 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #30,460 of 49,026 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.