A tradition ignored: Review essay of John Symons' on Dennett

Brain and Mind 2 (3):343-358 (2001)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Although Symons' recent book, On Dennett (Wadsworth, 2002), provides scientists with ahelpful, general introduction to Dennett'sthought, it presents a skewed version of the history of the philosophy of mind. In particular, the continental tradition is almost entirely ignored, if not glibly dismissed. As aresult, the unwary reader of this book wouldnever realize that Dilthey, Sartre and Husserl,like Dennett, offer a ``middle ground'' between naturalistic realism and naturalistic eliminativism. However, unlike Dennett, the respective positions of Dilthey, Sartre and Husserl are not ontologically indifferent, but instead, present a non-naturalistic form of realism that does not simultaneously invoke Cartesian dualism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ROCATI
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-10-03
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
81 ( #47,954 of 2,448,304 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #56,005 of 2,448,304 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.