Coherentism and Inconsistency

Southwest Philosophy Review 27 (1):185-193 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
If a subject’s belief system is inconsistent, does it follow that the subject’s beliefs (all of them) are unjustified? It seems not. But, coherentist theories of justification (at least some of them) imply otherwise, and so, it seems, are open to counterexample. This is the “Problem of Justified Inconsistent Beliefs”.  I examine two main versions of the Problem of Justified Inconsistent Beliefs, and argue that coherentists can give at least a promising line of response to each of them.
Categories
Reprint years
2012
ISBN(s)
0897-2346
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ROCCAI
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-03-02
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-11-01

Total views
163 ( #29,035 of 55,809 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #36,986 of 55,809 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.