The Perils of Parsimony

Journal of Philosophy 115 (9):485-505 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is widely thought in philosophy and elsewhere that parsimony is a theoretical virtue in that if T1 is more parsimonious than T2, then T1 is preferable to T2, other things being equal. This thesis admits of many distinct precisifications. I focus on a relatively weak precisification on which preferability is a matter of probability, and argue that it is false. This is problematic for various alternative precisifications, and even for Inference to the Best Explanation as standardly understood.

Author's Profile

William Roche
Texas Christian University

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-19

Downloads
640 (#12,125)

6 months
59 (#15,467)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?