There are no good objections to substance dualism

Philosophy 89 (2):199-222 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This article aims to review the standard objections to dualism and to argue that will either fail to convince someone committed to dualism or are flawed on independent grounds. I begin by presenting the taxonomy of metaphysical positions on concrete particulars as they relate to the dispute between materialists and dualists, and in particular substance dualism is defined. In the first section, several kinds of substance dualism are distinguished and the relevant varieties of this kind of dualism are selected. The remaining sections are analyses of the standard objections to substance dualism : It is uninformative, has troubles accounting for soul individuation, causal pairing and interaction, violates laws of physics, is made implausible by the development of neuroscience and it postulates entities beyond necessity. I conclude that none of these objections is successful.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RODTAN-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Giving Dualism its Due.Lycan, William G.
No Pairing Problem.Bailey, Andrew M.; Rasmussen, Joshua & van Horn, Luke
Does Interactionism Violate a Law of Classical Physics?Averill, Edward W. & Keating, Bernard

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Death of Socrates.Futter, Dylan Brian

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-06-07

Total views
775 ( #2,307 of 38,105 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
242 ( #1,206 of 38,105 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.