Untying the gorgianic ‘not’: Argumentative structure in on not-being

Classical Quarterly 69 (1):87-106 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Gorgias’ On Not-Being survives only in two divergent summaries. Diels–Kranz's classic edition prints the better-preserved version that appears in Sextus’ Aduersus Mathematicos. Yet, in recent years there has been rising interest in a second summary that survives as part of the anonymous De Melisso, Xenophane, Gorgia. The text of MXG is more difficult; it contains substantial lacunae that often make it much harder to make grammatical let alone philosophical sense of. As Alexander Mourelatos reports, one manuscript has a scribal note that reads: ‘The original contains many errors; no one should blame me; I just copy what I see.’2 The treatise's state of preservation has aptly prompted Michael Gagarin to liken it to a black hole: ‘something we cannot see directly but know must exist because of certain effects it has on other objects.’3.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RODUTG
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-06-19
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-06-19

Total views
123 ( #35,307 of 57,163 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #22,543 of 57,163 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.