Pragmatist Egalitarianism Revisited: Some Replies to my Critics

Contemporary Pragmatism 16 (4):337-347 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this article, I reply to some criticisms of my book, Pragmatist Egalitarianism, offered by professors Robert Talisse, Susan Dieleman, and Alexander Livingston. Some of the major themes and questions I address include the following: How are conflicts between different egalitarian ideals best understood and addressed? Does the quest for equality have a fundamental locus, or are the different egalitarian variables I identify in the book, conceptually speaking, on an equal footing? What is the relationship between justice and equality? How are feminist egalitarianism and Marxian egalitarianism best slotted into my distinction between “vertical” and “horizontal” egalitarianism? What does liberalism, problematic though it may sometimes be, have to contribute to the egalitarian project?
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RONPER-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-09-19
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-11-30

Total views
24 ( #64,100 of 65,721 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #46,328 of 65,721 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.