Why all classical theists should believe in physical premotions, but it doesn’t really matter

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
“Physical premotion” is a concept associated with Baroque Catholic theological debates concerning grace and freedom. In this paper, I present an argument that the entities identified in this debate, physical premotions, are necessary for any classical theist’s account of divine causality. A “classical theist” is a theist who holds both that God is simple, that is, without inhering properties, and that humans and God are both free in the incompatibilist sense. In fact, not only does the acceptance of physical premotions not entail determinism, physical premotions are the only way for classical theists to preserve the aforementioned two commitments. Nevertheless, the theory of premotions cannot help theologians resolve questions of how God causes human free acts without violating their freedom.
Keywords
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ROOWAC
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-08-23
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-02-15

Total views
42 ( #59,921 of 65,767 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #41,204 of 65,767 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.