Facts, Principles, and Politics

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (2):505-520 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Should our factual understanding of the world influence our normative theorising about it? G.A. Cohen has argued that our ultimate normative principles should not be constrained by facts. Many others have defended or are committed to various versions or subsets of that claim. In this paper I dispute those positions by arguing that, in order to resist the conclusion that ultimate normative principles rest on facts about possibility or conceivability, one has to embrace an unsatisfactory account of how principles generate normative political judgments. So political theorists have to choose between principles ostensibly unbiased by our current understanding of human motivation and political reality, or principles capable of reliably generating political judgments. I conclude with wider methodological observations in defence of the latter option, and so of a return to political philosophy’s traditional blend of normative and descriptive elements.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Domain of Reasons.Skorupski, John

View all 42 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Political Realism as Ideology Critique.Prinz, Janosch & Rossi, Enzo

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
494 ( #5,489 of 40,688 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
96 ( #4,776 of 40,688 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.