Justification and the Uniqueness Thesis

Logos and Episteme (4):571-577 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this paper, I offer two counterexamples to the so-called ‘Uniqueness Thesis.’ As one of these examples rely on the thesis that it is possible for a justified belief to be based on an inconsistent body of evidence, I also offer reasons for this further thesis. On the assumption that doxastic justification entails propositional justification, the counterexamples seem to work.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Uniqueness Thesis.Kopec, Matthew & Titelbaum, Michael G.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
319 ( #11,438 of 44,292 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
57 ( #12,237 of 44,292 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.