The Intrinsic Good of Justice

Ratio Juris 32 (2):193-209 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Some retributivists claim that when we punish wrongdoers we achieve a good: justice. The paper argues that the idea of justice, though rhetorically freighted with positive value, contains only a small core of universally-agreed meaning; and its development in a variety of competing conceptions simply recapitulates, without resolving, debates within the theory of punishment. If, to break this deadlock, we stipulate an expressly retributivist conception of justice, then we should concede that punishment which is just may be morally wrong.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ROSTIG
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-02-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-01-12

Total views
43 ( #43,672 of 50,091 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #24,748 of 50,091 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.