The Form is Not a Proper Part in Aristotle’s Metaphysics Z.17, 1041b11–33

Metaphysics 1 (1):75-87 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
When Aristotle argues at the Metaphysics Z.17, 1041b11–33 that a whole, which is not a heap, contains ‘something else’, i.e. the form, besides the elements, it is not clear whether or not the form is a proper part of the whole. I defend the claim that the form is not a proper part within the context of the relevant passage, since the whole is divided into elements, not into elements and the form. Different divisions determine different senses of ‘part’, and thus the form is not a part in the same sense as the elements are parts. I object to Koslicki’s (2006) interpretation, according to which the form is a proper part along the elements in a single sense of ‘part’, although she insists that the form and the elements belong to different categories. I argue that Koslicki’s reading involves a category mistake, i.e. the conjunction of items that do not belong to the same category (Goldwater 2018). Since for Aristotle parthood presupposes some kind of similarity of parts, the conjunction of form and elements requires treating these items as somehow belonging to the same category, e.g. ‘being’, but no such category exists.
Keywords
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ROTTFI
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-08-18
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Structure of Objects.Koslicki, Kathrin

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-08-09

Total views
118 ( #28,796 of 47,298 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
46 ( #17,394 of 47,298 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.