Order:
  1. The Form is Not a Proper Part in Aristotle’s Metaphysics Z.17, 1041b11–33.Liva Rotkale - 2018 - Metaphysics 1 (1):75-87.
    When Aristotle argues at the Metaphysics Z.17, 1041b11–33 that a whole, which is not a heap, contains ‘something else’, i.e. the form, besides the elements, it is not clear whether or not the form is a proper part of the whole. I defend the claim that the form is not a proper part within the context of the relevant passage, since the whole is divided into elements, not into elements and the form. Different divisions determine different senses of ‘part’, and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  2. The Meaning of To Genos Tou Eidous Meros and To Eidos Tou Genous Meros in Aristotle’s Metaphysics Δ 25.Liva Rotkale - 2014 - In Antiquitas Viva. Studia classica. Vol. 4. Riga, Latvia: pp. 58.‒66.
    In his Metaphysics Δ 25, 1023b24–5 Aristotle juxtaposes 'to genos tou eidous meros' and 'to eidos tou genous meros' by saying that the genus is a part of the form in a different way (allōs) than the form is a part of the genus. The author of the article considers how to interpret the word 'allōs' and argues for the idea that the contrast marked by 'allōs' reveals two different meanings of 'meros', in each case expressing a different relation of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark