Alternate Possibilities and their Entertainment

Philosophy 73 (4):559-571 (1998)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper it is argued that Frankfurt's and Strawson's defenses of compatibilism are insufficient due to neglected features of the role of alternate possibilities in assigning moral responsibility. An attempt is made to locate more adequately the genuine source of tension between free will and determinism, in a crowding phenomenon in the view of an action which our concept of responsibility has not grown up coping with. Finally, an argument is made that due to the nature of belief we can believe the thesis of determinism only if it is false, lending support to incompatibilism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ROUAPA
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-07-01
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
89 ( #47,581 of 64,194 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #60,571 of 64,194 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.