'In Between Believing' and Degrees of Belief

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Schwitzgebel (2001) ā€” henceforth 'S' ā€” offers three examples in order to convince us that there are situations in which individuals are neither accurately describable as believing that p or failing to so believe, but are rather in 'in-between states of belief'. He then argues that there are no 'Bayesian' or representational strategies for explicating these, and proposes a dispositional account. I do not have any fundamental objection to the idea that there might be 'in-between states of belief'. What I shall argue, rather, is that: (I) S does not provide a convincing argument that there really are such states; (II) S does not show, as he claims, that 'in-between states of belief' could not be accounted for in terms of degrees of belief; (III) Sā€™s dispositional account of 'in-between states of belief' is more problematic than the 'degree of belief' alternative.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ROWQBB
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-06-24

Total views
840 ( #6,586 of 65,772 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #44,164 of 65,772 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.