Further defence of legal age change: a reply to the critics

Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (7):471-472 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In ‘Moral case for legal age change’, I argue that sometimes people should be allowed to change their age. I refute six immediate objections against the view that age change is permissible. I argue that the objections cannot show that legal age change should always be prohibited. In this paper, I consider some further objections against legal age change raised by Iain Brassington, Toni Saad and William Simkulet. I argue that the objections fail to show that age change should never be allowed.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
2019
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RSNFDO
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-05-23
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-05-23

Total views
163 ( #34,598 of 2,448,668 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #46,981 of 2,448,668 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.