Further defence of legal age change: a reply to the critics

Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (7):471-472 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In ‘Moral case for legal age change’, I argue that sometimes people should be allowed to change their age. I refute six immediate objections against the view that age change is permissible. I argue that the objections cannot show that legal age change should always be prohibited. In this paper, I consider some further objections against legal age change raised by Iain Brassington, Toni Saad and William Simkulet. I argue that the objections fail to show that age change should never be allowed.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
2019
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RSNFDO
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-05-23
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Moral Case for Legal Age Change.Joona Räsänen - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (7):461-464.
On Legal Age Change.Simkulet, William

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-05-23

Total views
127 ( #29,286 of 50,123 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #25,480 of 50,123 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.