Further defence of legal age change: a reply to the critics

Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (7):471-472 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In ‘Moral case for legal age change’, I argue that sometimes people should be allowed to change their age. I refute six immediate objections against the view that age change is permissible. I argue that the objections cannot show that legal age change should always be prohibited. In this paper, I consider some further objections against legal age change raised by Iain Brassington, Toni Saad and William Simkulet. I argue that the objections fail to show that age change should never be allowed.

Author's Profile

Joona Räsänen
Aarhus School of Business

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-05-23

Downloads
196 (#39,466)

6 months
23 (#42,926)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?