Regulating abortion after ectogestation

Journal of Medical Ethics:medethics-2022-108174 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
A few decades from now, it might become possible to gestate fetuses in artificial wombs. Ectogestation as this is called, raises major legal and ethical issues, especially for abortion rights. In countries allowing abortion, regulation often revolves around the viability threshold—the point in fetal development after which the fetus can survive outside the womb. How should viability be understood—and abortion thus regulated—after ectogestation? Should we ban, allow or require the use of artificial wombs as an alternative to standard abortions? Drawing on Cohen, I evaluate three possible positions for the post-ectogestative abortion laws: restrictive, conservative and liberal. While the restrictive position appears untenable, I argue that the liberal and conservative positions can be combined to form a legally and morally coherent basis for post-ectogestative abortion legislation, offering an improvement from the point of both prolife and prochoice positions.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RSNRAA
Upload history
First archival date: 2022-06-21
Latest version: 2 (2022-06-21)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2022-06-21

Total views
105 ( #50,216 of 70,085 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
105 ( #6,795 of 70,085 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.