Socrates in the fMRI Scanner: The Neurofoundations of Morality and the Challenge to Ethics

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The neuroscience of ethics is allegedly having a double impact. First, it is transforming the view of human morality through the discovery of the neurobiological underpinnings that influence moral behavior. Secondly, some neuroscientific findings are radically challenging traditional views on normative ethics. Both claims have some truth but are also overstated. In this article, the author shows that they can be understood together, although with different caveats, under the label of ‘neurofoundationalism’. Whereas the neuroscientific picture of human morality is undoubtedly valuable if we avoid neuroessentialistic portraits, the empirical disruption of normative ethics seems less plausible. The neuroscience of morality, however, is providing relevant evidence that any empirically-informed ethical theory needs to critically consider. Although neuroethics is not going to bridge the is-ought divide, it may establish certain facts that require us to rethink the way we achieve our ethical aspirations.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RUESIT
Upload history
First archival date: 2021-10-27
Latest version: 2 (2021-10-27)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-06-04

Total views
34 ( #61,856 of 65,767 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #24,641 of 65,767 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.