Memory, Natural Kinds, and Cognitive Extension; or, Martians Don't Remember, and Cognitive Science Is Not about Cognition

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper evaluates the Natural-Kinds Argument for cognitive extension, which purports to show that the kinds presupposed by our best cognitive science have instances external to human organism. Various interpretations of the argument are articulated and evaluated, using the overarching categories of memory and cognition as test cases. Particular emphasis is placed on criteria for the scientific legitimacy of generic kinds, that is, kinds characterized in very broad terms rather than in terms of their fine-grained causal roles. Given the current state of cognitive science, I conclude that we have no reason to think memory or cognition are generic natural kinds that can ground an argument for cognitive extension
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RUPMNK
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 3 (2019-01-07)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Bounds of Cognition.Adams, Frederick & Aizawa, Kenneth
The Extended Mind.Clark, Andy & Chalmers, David J.

View all 51 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-12-11

Total views
573 ( #3,641 of 38,049 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
47 ( #8,080 of 38,049 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.